From: Andy K. <sup...@gm...> - 2009-11-11 04:50:23
|
Why are we using configManager instead of QSettings? I am about to go on a crusade to clean up the preferences dialog and configManager using QSettings... -- Andy Kelley http://superjoesoftware.com/ |
From: Tobias D. <tob...@gm...> - 2009-11-11 08:32:00
|
Hi, Am Mittwoch, 11. November 2009 05:50:12 schrieb Andy Kelley: > Why are we using configManager instead of QSettings? > > I am about to go on a crusade to clean up the preferences dialog and > configManager using QSettings... This is already on my TODO list and I started basic work on a new settings dialog. If possible stick with something else to avoid duplicate effort. Toby |
From: Andy K. <sup...@gm...> - 2009-11-13 15:16:20
|
Tobias, Is there a branch for this? Can I work on it? On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 1:31 AM, Tobias Doerffel <tob...@gm...>wrote: > Hi, > > Am Mittwoch, 11. November 2009 05:50:12 schrieb Andy Kelley: > > Why are we using configManager instead of QSettings? > > > > I am about to go on a crusade to clean up the preferences dialog and > > configManager using QSettings... > This is already on my TODO list and I started basic work on a new settings > dialog. If possible stick with something else to avoid duplicate effort. > > Toby > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus > on > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with > Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july > _______________________________________________ > LMMS-devel mailing list > LMM...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel > > -- Andy Kelley http://superjoesoftware.com/ |
From: Tobias D. <tob...@gm...> - 2009-11-13 23:56:27
|
Hi, Am Freitag, 13. November 2009 16:16:09 schrieben Sie: > Is there a branch for this? Can I work on it? Not really. I committed my initial work on the GUI part of the new preferences dialog to master branch. I hope I can integrate a new ConfigStorageBackend soon (maybe based on my previous work for iTALC this year) so you can continue working on it. Toby |
From: Nikos C. <re...@ar...> - 2009-11-14 02:28:31
|
On 11/14/2009 01:56 AM, Tobias Doerffel wrote: > Hi, > > Am Freitag, 13. November 2009 16:16:09 schrieben Sie: >> Is there a branch for this? Can I work on it? > Not really. I committed my initial work on the GUI part of the new preferences > dialog to master branch. I hope I can integrate a new ConfigStorageBackend > soon (maybe based on my previous work for iTALC this year) so you can continue > working on it. Can't you do this in another repo perhaps? It's bad to have a non-functional master branch. Maybe creating a personal repo on github or similar might be a good idea. |
From: Paul G. <dr...@gm...> - 2009-11-11 13:12:04
|
On a similar note, I plan to have the new editors expose a list of qactions. This way, user-specified shortcuts would be simple. Also, it would be looser coupling when wiring components together (toolbars, etc) On Nov 11, 2009 3:34 AM, "Tobias Doerffel" <tob...@gm...> wrote: Hi, Am Mittwoch, 11. November 2009 05:50:12 schrieb Andy Kelley: > Why are we using configManager instead of QSettings? > > I am about to go on a crusade to clean u... This is already on my TODO list and I started basic work on a new settings dialog. If possible stick with something else to avoid duplicate effort. Toby ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list LMM...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel |
From: Andy K. <sup...@gm...> - 2009-11-12 01:18:57
|
Sounds good. On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 6:11 AM, Paul Giblock <dr...@gm...> wrote: > On a similar note, I plan to have the new editors expose a list of > qactions. This way, user-specified shortcuts would be simple. Also, it > would be looser coupling when wiring components together (toolbars, etc) > > On Nov 11, 2009 3:34 AM, "Tobias Doerffel" <tob...@gm...> > wrote: > > Hi, > > Am Mittwoch, 11. November 2009 05:50:12 schrieb Andy Kelley: > > > Why are we using configManager instead of QSettings? > > I am about to go > on a crusade to clean u... > This is already on my TODO list and I started basic work on a new settings > dialog. If possible stick with something else to avoid duplicate effort. > > Toby > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus > on > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with > Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july > _______________________________________________ > LMMS-devel mailing list > LMM...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus > on > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with > Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july > _______________________________________________ > LMMS-devel mailing list > LMM...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel > > -- Andy Kelley http://superjoesoftware.com/ |
From: Paul G. <dr...@gm...> - 2009-11-13 16:44:39
|
Toby, just a note while you refactor, the default-sf2 setting needs to be updated for the resource framework On Nov 13, 2009 10:16 AM, "Andy Kelley" <sup...@gm...> wrote: Tobias, Is there a branch for this? Can I work on it? On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 1:31 AM, Tobias Doerffel <tob...@gm...> wrote: > > > Hi, > > Am Mittwoch, 11. November 2009 05:50:12 schrieb Andy Kelley: > > > Why are we using config... > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Let Crystal Repor... > -- Andy Kelley http://superjoesoftware.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list LMM...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel |
From: Andy K. <sup...@gm...> - 2009-11-14 00:54:30
|
okay, sounds good. Perhaps we should use git branches to do development work, and then merge into master when we deem them stable. That way, git master can be the latest and greatest, as well as stable. What do you think? On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Tobias Doerffel <tob...@gm...>wrote: > Hi, > > Am Freitag, 13. November 2009 16:16:09 schrieben Sie: > > Is there a branch for this? Can I work on it? > Not really. I committed my initial work on the GUI part of the new > preferences > dialog to master branch. I hope I can integrate a new ConfigStorageBackend > soon (maybe based on my previous work for iTALC this year) so you can > continue > working on it. > > Toby > -- Andy Kelley http://superjoesoftware.com/ |
From: Kevin F. <kev...@ei...> - 2009-11-14 02:16:10
|
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> That is an awesome idea. I wish more projects did that...<br> <br> <div class="moz-signature"> <table style="text-align: left; width: 200px; font-family: sans-serif;" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"> <tbody> <tr> <td><span style="font-weight: bold;">Kevin Fishburne</span><br> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <table style="text-align: left; width: 200px; font-family: sans-serif;" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"> <tbody> <tr> <td>Eight Virtues<br> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <table style="text-align: left; width: 200px; font-family: sans-serif;" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"> <tbody> <tr> <td><font size="-1">www:<br> e-mail:<br> phone:</font></td> <td><font size="-1"> <a href="http://www.eightvirtues.com">http://www.eightvirtues.com</a><br> <a href="mailto:sa...@ei...">sa...@ei...</a><br> (770) 853-6271</font></td> </tr> </tbody> </table> </div> <br> <br> Andy Kelley wrote: <blockquote cite="mid:bc9...@ma..." type="cite">okay, sounds good. Perhaps we should use git branches to do development work, and then merge into master when we deem them stable. That way, git master can be the latest and greatest, as well as stable. What do you think?<br> <br> <div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Tobias Doerffel <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:tob...@gm...">tob...@gm...</a>></span> wrote:<br> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Hi,<br> <br> Am Freitag, 13. November 2009 16:16:09 schrieben Sie:<br> <div class="im">> Is there a branch for this? Can I work on it?<br> </div> Not really. I committed my initial work on the GUI part of the new preferences<br> dialog to master branch. I hope I can integrate a new ConfigStorageBackend<br> soon (maybe based on my previous work for iTALC this year) so you can continue<br> working on it.<br> <br> Toby<br> </blockquote> </div> <br> <br clear="all"> <br> -- <br> Andy Kelley<br> <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://superjoesoftware.com/">http://superjoesoftware.com/</a><br> <pre wrap=""> <hr size="4" width="90%"> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july">http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july</a></pre> <pre wrap=""> <hr size="4" width="90%"> _______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:LMM...@li...">LMM...@li...</a> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel</a> </pre> </blockquote> </body> </html> |
From: Tobias D. <tob...@gm...> - 2009-11-14 09:15:09
|
Hi, Am Samstag, 14. November 2009 01:21:47 schrieb Andy Kelley: > okay, sounds good. Perhaps we should use git branches to do development > work, and then merge into master when we deem them stable. That way, git > master can be the latest and greatest, as well as stable. What do you > think? Yes, definitely. I even created a new local branch here but finally forgot to switch to it and commit and push this new stuff into it... this way it made it into master.. Am Samstag, 14. November 2009 03:28:00 schrieb Nikos Chantziaras: > Can't you do this in another repo perhaps? It's bad to have a > non-functional master branch. Maybe creating a personal repo on github > or similar might be a good idea. Why another repo?? It'll be developed in a separate branch - that's it. Also my commit doesn't break anything, because it just adds the dialog as another option in "Edit" menu. So please don't worry. Toby |
From: Andy K. <sup...@gm...> - 2009-11-16 09:23:10
|
It sounds like everyone is in favor of using git master as "stable." So let's figure out what needs to be done in order to get it to that state: * Welcome Screen needs to be completed * the crappy automation recording that is in master needs to be moved into a branch anything else? On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 2:14 AM, Tobias Doerffel <tob...@gm...>wrote: > Hi, > > Am Samstag, 14. November 2009 01:21:47 schrieb Andy Kelley: > > okay, sounds good. Perhaps we should use git branches to do development > > work, and then merge into master when we deem them stable. That way, git > > master can be the latest and greatest, as well as stable. What do you > > think? > Yes, definitely. I even created a new local branch here but finally forgot > to > switch to it and commit and push this new stuff into it... this way it made > it > into master.. > > Am Samstag, 14. November 2009 03:28:00 schrieb Nikos Chantziaras: > > Can't you do this in another repo perhaps? It's bad to have a > > non-functional master branch. Maybe creating a personal repo on github > > or similar might be a good idea. > Why another repo?? It'll be developed in a separate branch - that's it. > Also > my commit doesn't break anything, because it just adds the dialog as > another > option in "Edit" menu. So please don't worry. > > Toby > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus > on > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with > Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july > _______________________________________________ > LMMS-devel mailing list > LMM...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel > > -- Andy Kelley http://superjoesoftware.com/ |
From: Louigi V. <lou...@gm...> - 2009-11-16 09:27:23
|
If I understand correctly and it is about bringing the git version to a more stable one, I think the Great Copy Bug which I have mentioned earlier should be taken care of as it makes the software look lame. Lemme quote: *4. When you copy notes from one BB pattern to the other, the notes do not show until you close the project. Maybe this is something that is a temporary thing of the git version, but it certainly makes things difficult. * Louigi. On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Andy Kelley <sup...@gm...> wrote: > It sounds like everyone is in favor of using git master as "stable." So > let's figure out what needs to be done in order to get it to that state: > > * Welcome Screen needs to be completed > * the crappy automation recording that is in master needs to be moved into > a branch > > anything else? > > On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 2:14 AM, Tobias Doerffel < > tob...@gm...> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Am Samstag, 14. November 2009 01:21:47 schrieb Andy Kelley: >> > okay, sounds good. Perhaps we should use git branches to do development >> > work, and then merge into master when we deem them stable. That way, git >> > master can be the latest and greatest, as well as stable. What do you >> > think? >> Yes, definitely. I even created a new local branch here but finally forgot >> to >> switch to it and commit and push this new stuff into it... this way it >> made it >> into master.. >> >> Am Samstag, 14. November 2009 03:28:00 schrieb Nikos Chantziaras: >> > Can't you do this in another repo perhaps? It's bad to have a >> > non-functional master branch. Maybe creating a personal repo on github >> > or similar might be a good idea. >> Why another repo?? It'll be developed in a separate branch - that's it. >> Also >> my commit doesn't break anything, because it just adds the dialog as >> another >> option in "Edit" menu. So please don't worry. >> >> Toby >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 >> 30-Day >> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus >> on >> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with >> Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july >> _______________________________________________ >> LMMS-devel mailing list >> LMM...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel >> >> > > > -- > Andy Kelley > http://superjoesoftware.com/ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus > on > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with > Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july > _______________________________________________ > LMMS-devel mailing list > LMM...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel > > |
From: Tobias D. <tob...@gm...> - 2009-11-16 09:50:10
|
Hi, Am Montag, 16. November 2009 10:22:59 schrieb Andy Kelley: > It sounds like everyone is in favor of using git master as "stable." So > let's figure out what needs to be done in order to get it to that state: Ok, then let's follow the topic-branch development model for the future (as we already started a few months ago). > * Welcome Screen needs to be completed Yes. This needs some simple work such as adding support for tutorials, add a "did you know" database somewhere online (and a possibility to ship LMMS with a default set of these hints). The "Instant MIDI action" button requires the new preferences dialog to be finished. In the new dialog you will be able to select a default instrument (e.g. Sf2Player (for which a default sf2 can be configured)) as well as select the default MIDI device. For my part I'll focus on the new preferences dialog now. I hope to find some time this evening to finally add and complete the QSettings-based configuration framework (I already have in my other project iTALC). After that my next steps will be to finish resource framework: * a dialog for managing resource locations (folders, online resources) * new resource-based project file format * non-blocking fetch of resources (esp. important for online data) * fix bugs > * the crappy automation recording that is in master needs to be moved into > a branch Moving that to a separate branch now, doesn't seem to make much sense to me. I'd rather commit fixes for this directly to master now. If possible, I want to avoid to revert all commits that introduced automation recording and start over (possibly with the same code) in a new branch. However it's up to you, as this is your feature.. Toby |
From: Stephane T. <st...@ne...> - 2009-11-16 10:14:58
|
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:22:59 -0700 Andy Kelley <sup...@gm...> wrote: > It sounds like everyone is in favor of using git master as "stable." So > let's figure out what needs to be done in order to get it to that state: > > * Welcome Screen needs to be completed > * the crappy automation recording that is in master needs to be moved into a > branch > > anything else? As said before I would say that copy notes and cloning pattern issue (lmms needs to be restarted to make new notes to appear) needs to be fixed. Stef |
From: Paul G. <dr...@gm...> - 2009-11-16 13:56:29
|
Good reply, toby. I think we may want to discuss the new file format one more time before someone sits down to implement it. On Nov 16, 2009 4:50 AM, "Tobias Doerffel" <tob...@gm...> wrote: Hi, Am Montag, 16. November 2009 10:22:59 schrieb Andy Kelley: > It sounds like everyone is in favor of using git master as "stable." So > let's figure out what ne... Ok, then let's follow the topic-branch development model for the future (as we already started a few months ago). > * Welcome Screen needs to be completed Yes. This needs some simple work such as adding support for tutorials, add a "did you know" database somewhere online (and a possibility to ship LMMS with a default set of these hints). The "Instant MIDI action" button requires the new preferences dialog to be finished. In the new dialog you will be able to select a default instrument (e.g. Sf2Player (for which a default sf2 can be configured)) as well as select the default MIDI device. For my part I'll focus on the new preferences dialog now. I hope to find some time this evening to finally add and complete the QSettings-based configuration framework (I already have in my other project iTALC). After that my next steps will be to finish resource framework: * a dialog for managing resource locations (folders, online resources) * new resource-based project file format * non-blocking fetch of resources (esp. important for online data) * fix bugs > * the crappy automation recording that is in master needs to be moved into > a branch Moving that to a separate branch now, doesn't seem to make much sense to me. I'd rather commit fixes for this directly to master now. If possible, I want to avoid to revert all commits that introduced automation recording and start over (possibly with the same code) in a new branch. However it's up to you, as this is your feature.. Toby ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list LMM...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel |