From: Tobiasz K. <un...@gm...> - 2012-01-17 07:43:35
|
I was using 0.4.10 to finish my album, but I didn't notice my system was to update LMMS to version 0.4.12 (which I don't want). It happened. LMMS was like totally broken and didn't have any audio plugins (no TripleOsc, no sampler, no Zyn, no nothing) - this problem is familiar from compiling LMMS from sources. I managed to get LMMS back to 0.4.11 (it has all plugins), but still all my work is broken now. Sic! I use ZynAddSubFX for 99% of the sounds in my projects. Somehow envelopes are behaving way different in each of the three versions of LMMS: 0.4.10 0.4.11 0.4.12 I have to manually correct almost all instruments (mainly drums) to make it right, which I did for 0.4.10. Now I need to get my 0.4.10 back to finish the album, or I'll have to pull out my hair... So does someone has a *64-bit .deb of LMMS 0.4.10* to share with me, please? -- Tobiasz *unfa* -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GIT/MU/P d->-- s+:-(--)> a? C++(+++)>$ ULC+(++)>$ !P? L+++>++++$ E? W++>$ !N-? !o--? K-? !w-- O? !M-- V? PS++ PE++ !Y+ !PGP+? !t(+) 5? !X !R+ tv b+>+++ DI>+ D+ G e h-->- !r y--() ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ |
From: musikBear <mk...@ho...> - 2012-01-17 10:32:29
|
Tobiasz Karoń wrote: > > So does someone has a *64-bit .deb of LMMS 0.4.10* to share with me, > please? > Something else must be wrong. there is no difference in zynAddSubFX from 0.10 to 0.12 -but here: https://sourceforge.net/projects/lmms/files/lmms/0.4.10-old/ you should find a secure off. dl of 0.10 Hope you can use it Br. ----- Hope this helped BR. --------------------- Tutorials and some music on : http://www.youtube.com/user/bearsoundz -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/ZynAddSubFX-broken-presets-0.4.12-%3C-%3E-0.4.11-PLEASE-HELP%21-tp33152378p33153181.html Sent from the lmms-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |
From: Janne S. <jan...@gm...> - 2012-01-19 19:05:41
|
No, here's a good example case. http://lmms.sourceforge.net/lsp/index.php?action=show&file=2366 Compare the bass in both 0.4.10 and 0.4.12. 2012/1/17 musikBear <mk...@ho...>: > > > > Tobiasz Karoń wrote: >> >> So does someone has a *64-bit .deb of LMMS 0.4.10* to share with me, >> please? >> > > Something else must be wrong. there is no difference in zynAddSubFX from > 0.10 to 0.12 -but here: > https://sourceforge.net/projects/lmms/files/lmms/0.4.10-old/ > you should find a secure off. dl of 0.10 > > Hope you can use it > Br. > > ----- > Hope this helped > BR. > --------------------- > Tutorials and some music on : http://www.youtube.com/user/bearsoundz > > -- > View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/ZynAddSubFX-broken-presets-0.4.12-%3C-%3E-0.4.11-PLEASE-HELP%21-tp33152378p33153181.html > Sent from the lmms-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! > The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers > is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, > Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d > _______________________________________________ > LMMS-devel mailing list > LMM...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel |
From: Tobias D. <tob...@gm...> - 2012-01-19 20:17:24
|
Hi, 2012/1/19 Janne Sinisalo <jan...@gm...>: > No, here's a good example case. > > http://lmms.sourceforge.net/lsp/index.php?action=show&file=2366 > > Compare the bass in both 0.4.10 and 0.4.12. Yeah, you're right, it indeed differs.. Looks like http://lmms.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=lmms/lmms;a=commit;h=56d7e2e6ecb9eefeef34c29679d53a2620e6286c is causing this. However as this is an upstream fix, I'm not sure which behaviour is correct, i.e. whether to revert this change in LMMS or not.. any opinions on this? Best regards Toby |
From: David G. <dg...@gm...> - 2012-01-19 20:53:03
|
On 19 January 2012 20:17, Tobias Doerffel <tob...@gm...> wrote: > Yeah, you're right, it indeed differs.. Looks like > http://lmms.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=lmms/lmms;a=commit;h=56d7e2e6ecb9eefeef34c29679d53a2620e6286c > is causing this. However as this is an upstream fix, I'm not sure > which behaviour is correct, i.e. whether to revert this change in LMMS > or not.. any opinions on this? It's ... a tricky one. I expect my instruments not to change out from underneath me in a minor point upgrade. OTOH, when could you ever then upgrade to upstream? The problem is that instruments are instruments, and a bug to the developer is a quirk to someone who's come to rely on the bug. Suggestion: that sort of change should really be a major number upgrade, say 0.4 to 0.5. - d. |
From: Tobias D. <tob...@gm...> - 2012-02-02 21:57:22
|
Hi, there has been a fix for this issue by the ZynAddSubFX guys. I just incorporated it into LMMS and it will be fixed in 0.4.13 as well. Best regards 2012/1/19 Tobias Doerffel <tob...@gm...>: > Hi, > > 2012/1/19 Janne Sinisalo <jan...@gm...>: >> No, here's a good example case. >> >> http://lmms.sourceforge.net/lsp/index.php?action=show&file=2366 >> >> Compare the bass in both 0.4.10 and 0.4.12. > Yeah, you're right, it indeed differs.. Looks like > http://lmms.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=lmms/lmms;a=commit;h=56d7e2e6ecb9eefeef34c29679d53a2620e6286c > is causing this. However as this is an upstream fix, I'm not sure > which behaviour is correct, i.e. whether to revert this change in LMMS > or not.. any opinions on this? > |