From: Paul W. <pa...@ma...> - 2007-10-12 20:42:31
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi developers! I've got two quick questions about LMMS which would solve a few problems that I've been having in composing. Firstly, is there any way to put in third-notes - the quantisation in the piano-roll seems to only go down to 32nds; I'd like something like 96ths. Or, if it doesn't exist, would it be possible for someone who understands C++ to put it in? Secondly, I've bought a couple of synth patches where they supply several samples across a range of keys. Some of them are regular - C, F#, C, F# and so forth up the scale - and others are more like B, E, B, E or B, D, G, B, D, B. I know this is a couple of levels more difficult to program than the one above, but it would be really useful, especially for natural instruments such as violins where the natural harmonics of the instrument change as you go up the scale. It feels difficult for me, who can understand C but who gets lost in C++ and whose contribution to LMMS is limited to writing a couple of tunes for which I haven't yet released the mmpz file. I was hoping to put on a tutorial at LCA 2008 on composing in LMMS but that's been rejected, and I intend to make some screencasts and write some documentation when I get back from overseas. So I'd really appreciate an interested developer looking into these two projects. Thanks in advance, Paul -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHD9wau7W0U8VsXYIRAjE3AJwNdtN+NBH/pCOCkh2pPtyGan+JXQCdHS8U FpWhRR9/1LzVbQ4hhyeuf+U= =mgA9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
From: mass_konfuzion <lh...@gm...> - 2007-10-29 02:01:40
|
Paul Wayper wrote: > > Firstly, is there any way to put in third-notes - the quantisation in the > piano-roll seems to only go down to 32nds; I'd like something like 96ths. > Or, > if it doesn't exist, would it be possible for someone who understands C++ > to > put it in? > I agree with this. With a timebase of 96 ticks, as opposed to 64, LMMS would be unstoppable. Along with this, I read somewhere (can't remember which thread it was) that someone wanted the ability to make songs in custom time signatures (e.g. 3/4, 6/8, whatever). I feel that these are feature additions I could hammer out. Toby, what's the process for keeping track of what changes need to be made and coordinating w/ other developers to improve LMMS? I have a wishlist of features that I would like to see or add myself. Also, besides Toby and Rob (I mean Paul....inside joke), who are the other developers? [-mass_konfuzion-] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Third-notes-and-wave-mixing-patches-tf4615969.html#a13460469 Sent from the lmms-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |