They all use md5 checksums. Is there a way if people are worried of using a more secure encryption algorithm such as SHA256 or SHA 512?


On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 10:42 AM, David Gerard <dgerard@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8 March 2014 06:29, Vesa <dii.dii@nbl.fi> wrote:

> So don't you tell me that it's impossible to guarantee security. It's not.
> It's just a matter of putting some effort to it.
> The question is, is this feature worth that effort.


The first rule of crypto implementation is "never roll your own". So
the question then is: what do other projects do? Say, Firefox, Chrome,
LibreOffice, Linux distros. Whatever approach to this is worth doing
will have been done already and should probably be adopted.


- d.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to Perforce.
With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works.
Faster operations. Version large binaries.  Built-in WAN optimization and the
freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
LMMS-devel mailing list
LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel



--
Jonathan Aquilina