It does work with tempo automation while you play a song. But when you are not playing it and change the tempo the time stays the same and this causes problems with seeking. When you play a song and seek it can cause problems too but this is because I don't know if this should be dealt by adding the points in the automation or use a cycle(There are many ways to deal with this, is just to know which is the correct one).

About standarizing the names. Of course I can change the name. What is needed for the package to be accepted in our tree and give the actual timer development for accepted? Would it be accepted part by part or it needs more things? I think part by part would be ok so there would be more cooperation and to deliver more features to the users and git testers.

Rubén Ibarra Pastor

> Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 22:36:56 +0200
> From:
> To:
> CC:
> Subject: Re: [LMMS-devel] Timer Patch(tested on Git version and fixed errors marked by Raine)
> Hi Rubén,
> thanks for the patch! Does it work properly in conjunction with tempo
> automation? Also could you please change the class member variables to
> follow LMMS' coding style guidelines ("m_fooBar" instead of "foobar").
> Besides this good job, thanks a lot!
> Best regards
> Toby
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
> Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
> Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
> Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
> _______________________________________________
> LMMS-devel mailing list