|
From: Ravi R. <ram...@gm...> - 2005-09-11 01:20:29
|
On 9/10/05, Ravi Ramaseshan <ram...@gm...> wrote: > Hi, >=20 > On 9/10/05, Kalpak Shah <kal...@gm...> wrote: > > hi aditya, > > > > I tried to follow up on the leads you gave us. > > > > On 8/30/05, Aditya Thakur <woo...@ya...> wrote: > > > > > > Actually, I can imagine how an inerpreter-like tool could be used to > > implement reversibility...actually, it would be more of a "reverse > > interpreter" , very very similar to the reverse instruction generator R= avi > > spoke about. So instead of generating (like a compiler) the reverse > > instructions, you would just do it at runtime (like an interpreter). wh= at > > say? > > > > I didnt find any great C interpreters(other than EiC) which could be u= sed > > to perform the "reverse interpreter" operation. Also we couldnt come up= with > > any convincing solution for the problem Ravi mentioned. Would this be m= ore > > beneficial in presence of available reversible debuggers? >=20 > Could you please tell us how do you plan on using a C-interpreter ? > What do you want the interpreter to do exactly ? This C-interpreter > thing you speak of seems very vague to me. As far as I see it, the C-interpreter thing is just seems to be a place where you're going to actually code/instrument-in your reverse code fragment. This whole discussion is way too vague ! You couldn't find C-interpreters to do what exactly ? What do you mean by "reverse interpretation" ? What is it supposed to interpret ? At what level are you working ? Why do you need a C interpreter ? What is your objective ? --=20 Ravi Ramaseshan http://www.geocities.com/ramaseshan_ravi/ " Reality is only something we believe in strongly. " |