Re: [lizard] Re: A few ideas

[Ravi R. <ram...@gm...>]

Hi,

On 9/10/05, Kalpak Shah <kal...@gm...> wrote:
> hi aditya,=20
> =20
>  I tried to follow up on the leads you gave us.=20
> =20
> On 8/30/05, Aditya Thakur <woo...@ya...> wrote:
> >=20
> > Actually, I can imagine how an inerpreter-like tool could be used to
> implement reversibility...actually, it would be more of a "reverse
> interpreter" , very very similar to the reverse instruction generator Rav=
i
> spoke about. So instead of generating (like a compiler) the reverse
> instructions, you would just do it at runtime (like an interpreter). what
> say?
>=20
>  I didnt find any great C interpreters(other than EiC) which could be use=
d
> to perform the "reverse interpreter" operation. Also we couldnt come up w=
ith
> any convincing solution for the problem Ravi mentioned. Would this be mor=
e
> beneficial in presence of available reversible debuggers?

Could you please tell us how do you plan on using a C-interpreter ?
What do you want the interpreter to do exactly ? This C-interpreter
thing you speak of seems very vague to me.
--=20
Ravi Ramaseshan
http://www.geocities.com/ramaseshan_ravi/

" Reality is only something we believe in strongly. "