Thread: [Lius-devp] LuceneActions.index

Brought to you by: benjellr

lius-devp

[Lius-devp] LuceneActions.index

From: JM T. <jm....@gm...> - 2005-06-17 09:12:17

Bonjour,
Dans la m=E9thode LuceneActions.index il y a :
      fileDirectoryIndexing(toIndex, lc, writer);
      setIndexWriterProps(writer, lc);

Est-ce que =E7=E0 ne devrait pas =EAtre l'inverse : initialiser les
propri=E9t=E9s du writer avant d'indexer?


Jean-Marie

Re: [Lius-devp] LuceneActions.index

From: Jens F. <jf...@te...> - 2005-06-17 10:17:59

On Friday 17 June 2005 11:38, JM Tinghir wrote:
> Oops, sorry, I totally forgot! And I've just sent another one... I'll
> resend it too.

thanks. helps a lot :-)

> In the LuceneActions.index method, there is :
>      fileDirectoryIndexing(toIndex, lc, writer);
>      setIndexWriterProps(writer, lc);
>
> Shouldn't it rather be :
>      setIndexWriterProps(writer, lc);
>      fileDirectoryIndexing(toIndex, lc, writer);
>
> Initializing the writer before indexing?

you're right. this should definitely be other way around (unless Rida had s=
ome=20
genius hack in mind I don't see right now.. :-)


=2D-=20
=2EO.  Jens Fendler
=2E.O  jf...@te...
OOO  http://www.teamskill.de

[Lius-devp] RE:LuceneActions.index

From: Rida B. <bi...@he...> - 2005-06-17 12:06:36

Hi Jean-marie,
Im sorry for the delay. I'm actually in Europe (France). And I don't 
have a lot of time to read and to answer the forum.
For your Questions :
You have totally reason its a mistake, we have to set the property 
before indexing. So you can correct it and put it into the CVS or I can 
do it if you want.
Olso for the performance or scalability, you have totally reason, and I 
think that we have to redesign it. Jens have a good idea : <reject 
pattern="/home/jf/Recordings/" /> this can be applied to the files that 
we don't want to index in the directory.
I olso think that we have to redesign the indexing process by making 
more scalable and multi-thread. I don't know if you have read the book 
Lucene in action ? this book suggest a good way for tread indexing.
I'm sorry, I have to go now, but I will write an other message to 
explain you how the new thread indexing will work.
For the updating process, I think that we can create a method for 
updating directory.
Best regards.
NB : Thanks Jean-marie for your message in English en French.