Re: [litwindow-users] Re: hello

[Peter D. <pd...@gm...>]

On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 09:22:38 +0100, Hajo Kirchhoff <mai...@ha...> wrote:

> Peter Damoc wrote:
>> Wouldn't a more dynamic language like python be more suited for rapid UI
>> development?
>
> The goal of the library is to cater to as many developers as possible.
> That is one of the reasons for choosing C++, but see below.
>
>> Are python bindings to litwindow planned?
>
> Definitely yes. Would you be interested in contributing? A small 'proof
> of concept' would be great.

This is way out of my league  I'm just an amateur using python as a prosthesis for my exacerbated laziness.
Anyway... the way I see it... python is better suited for the job litwindow is aiming.
Any serious C++ programmer could learn python in about... let's say one day... and wxpython maybe in about aaa... one
weekend. Ok... it might get more thant that to become proficient but still it beats C++.

The path is easier in my view comming from python... something like in:
- implement some concept mega-smart widget in python using wxpython, clear out the bugs and then port it into C++ for
eficienty (if necessary).

> Best regards
>
> Hajo Kirchhoff

-- 
Peter Damoc
Hacker Wannabe
http://www.sigmacore.net/