You can subscribe to this list here.
2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
2007 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Kimberly T. <kim...@at...> - 2008-04-03 22:04:19
|
test |
From: amber b. <hoo...@ya...> - 2007-10-14 15:04:56
|
Join --------------------------------- Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for today's economy) at Yahoo! Games. |
From: Brett P. <br...@um...> - 2004-11-05 02:11:15
|
Was wondering if the project for the installer had had any progress. I've been waiting to install this, but am denied shell access to my server, so I need the installer. Waiting patiently, ~Brett Patterson |
From: John <jo...@eh...> - 2002-04-05 05:22:05
|
I've upgraded lplib/lprevdb.c to work with the latest sleepycat package. I got it working with db version 4.0.14. There's another patch for the makeincludes/Makeinclude.global. I moved the db stuff into the listproc SRCDIR directory, so you need to extract it there, or make a symlink to wherever you extract it to called dbm. You don't need to install it, just move into the build_unix directory and do a ../dist/configure --enable-shared=no && make Then move into the dbm directory and make a symlink from build_unix/libdb.a to liblpdb.a. *** NOTE *** By default the db builds a shared library. I actually tried it this way, but I couldn't get it to work. It would build, but when it loaded the library, on my system it would load an older one from another directory. I suppose that if I messed around with the library search order on my system I could get it to work, but for right now I'm sticking with the static library. I got a fresh install with the new dbm library working. I was able to create a few lists and subscribe and post, so it looks like it's good. I hope you all can test it out too and let me know what you encounter! I'm working on an INSTALL.README type of file, so new users can figure out how to install it without pulling all their hair out. At least now they can use the latest sleepycat package instead of searching for the old one. My next task will be to implement autoconf so we can just do a ./configure && make && make install instead of having a bunch of different make files for each system type. BTW - we need to move the install.listproc and install.funcs into the SRCDIR, and create a text.blah.tar.Z from the text dir in the installation directory (and put that in SRCDIR too.) John Davison Unix System Administrator EH.Net http://eh.net/ email : jo...@eh... |
From: John <jo...@eh...> - 2002-04-01 04:43:03
|
I've got a couple notes here to go over. First off, it seems as though this version of Listproc depends on an old library from SleepyCat. Ye old Berkeley DB. I tried compiling with their current version, and it doesn't work. They've got some docs that show you how to upgrade, so there's an entry on a TODO list some where. The reason that I bring this up is because you need it to build Listproc, but it isn't included with the CVS distribution. I happend to have a copy that we got some time ago before this was open sourced, so I've been working with that. I haven't checked yet with the sleepycat site to see if they still have that up for download. Should we let users know where to get it or include it ourselves? Or should we upgrade Listproc so it uses the latest DB lib? ;-) The build process for Listproc is horrible, IMHO. I list below what I had to do to get it to build and install on my laptop running Linux. I was talking to Phillip Porch about using GNU's Autoconf system. Does anyone have any experiance with that program? I don't, but I want to learn. I think that I may concentrate on that first, so that we can just do a ./configure, make and make install like every other package out there. If anyone has any notes on that please let me know! In the meantime, I was thinking about creating an INSTALL file in the root directory that would explain what you have to do to get the system installed, unless there is one already that I missed. Here's my notes of what I had to do to get it installed on my Linux system. Linux nuclear.dynup.net 2.4.18 #7 Sun Mar 31 01:48:33 EST 2002 i686 unknown I'm using glibc v 2.2.5 First off, the way it's set up to build with the db library is a little weird. I put the dbm lib in the root listproc dir, (what SRCDIR is set to) and then changed the line in makeincludes/Makefile.global to DBDIR = $(SRCDIR)/dbm (that change is included in the patch). Then, for my system, there were a couple of lines that were preventing me from compiling in regexp.c. I added a -D__LINUX__ to the Makefile.local that I chose to use (Makeinclude.Linux-glibc2.1.1), and then did some #ifndef in regexp.c. I included the patch as an attachment to this message.. Also, in the dbm directory, you'll need two symlinks lpdb.h -> build_unix/db.h liblpdb.a -> build_unix/libdb.a The second one you make after you "make" the library. So then make all finishes, allthough on my machine it complains about using some mktempdir call or something like that, another TODO list entry. make dist works too. To install it, I had to copy the install.listproc and install.funcs from the installation directory into the root directory *and* I had to tar.gz the text directory into a file in the root directory that ends with .Z like tar zcf $SRCDIR/text.tar.Z text from the installation directory (the installation script looks for it there) Then it was installed. I still had to edit the aliases file for my system, and the config file for listproc before I could run it (of course.) I was thinking it would also be nice if we could have another script that could ask the user for values for the config file instead of manually editing it. I'd rather edit it myself, but some people might prefer a script to do it. So what I got on my list right now is: *update the db code to work with newer DB lib *implement autoconf, automake and other related tools *maybe a script to configure system though maybe not in that order. Anyone have any comments or ideas? John Davison Unix System Administrator EH.Net http://eh.net/ email : jo...@eh... |