From: Alec L. <lea...@gm...> - 2017-08-31 01:19:11
|
On 31/08/17 00:21, Michael Markstaller via LIRC-list wrote: > > My thoughts - as cuurently fiddling with getting the ancient > OpenWRT/LEDE package from 0.8x to a current release: > > Couldn't it be a --disable-python switch ? > > Reads like > "I-dont-have-any-python-anywhere-here-and-never-wanted-or-needed-it" (to > be involved in any part of the build-process of a C-program) ? > > It surely makes sense to have python in the client API built etc. but > why should python - at all - be a build-requirement for lircd itself ? As of now, python is used in the build as a platform-agnostic tool. Overall, I'm less concerned about a python (really python3) build dependency, especially when cross-compiling. I can't really understand that this BR should be a problem - python is really ubiquitous these days, and running python is much less demanding than compiling lirc. As a runtime-dependency I'm open. It's sort of an uncommon testcase, but in general accepting patches to handle systems without python3 in the target host should be fine. Cheers! --alec |