Re: Status of lirc. should I create new reciever driver against it?

[Maxim L. <max...@gm...>]

On Sat, 2009-05-30 at 10:56 +0200, Christoph Bartelmus wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> Maxim Levitsky "max...@gm..." wrote:
> [...]
> > But the idea of having a state machine is really great, and thus I think
> > that:
> >
> > 1 - we should cleanup kernel drivers, and merge them upstream,
> 
> *we* sounds good and actually this is the only problem that there simply  
> are not enough people helping here. But due to the big efforts of Jarod  
> and Janne, the code quality is now much much better than before.
While I am not by any means can judge the quality of code, indeed, the
lirc code seems to be ok, at least I don't see some bold violations,
etc.

Maybe it needs to be submitted to LKML, so they could review and tell
what they don't like? Or not?

Best regards,
	Maxim Levitsky