|
From: Sean M. <Sea...@su...> - 2003-05-15 11:59:30
|
Hi, There are 3 repositories in the linux-shmedia project. I am wondering if we can tidy things up a bit. The 'linux-2.4' tree is the main development tree, so no problems here. The 'linux' tree seems to be obsolete. It appears to be version 2.4.0-test4, and has not been modified for the last 11 months (last mod 24th June 2002). I propose to delete it - are there any problems or issues in doing this ? The 'linux-2.5' tree was last modified over 1 year ago (28th April 2002), and claims to be of the 2.5.11 vintage. I assume that when we want to put 2.5 for SH-5 into BitKeeper, we will start from a more recent baseline. Again, I propose to delete it - are there any problems or issues in doing this ? In summary, I propose to delete the 'linux' and 'linux-2.5' trees in linux-shmedia.bkbits.net. Does anyone know of a reason why this is a bad thing to do ? Also, now that the main arch tree has been renamed from 'shmedia' to 'sh64', what should we do about the BitKeeper project - should we rename 'linux-shmedia.bkbits.net' to 'linux-sh64.bkbits.net' ? If so, how do we do this, create a new project, clone from old, and delete old project - I assume one can not rename a project. Regards, Sean -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ | Sean McGoogan, | E-mail: Sea...@Su... | | SuperH (UK) Ltd., | | | 2410 Aztec West, | Direct: +44 (0) 1454 465670 | | Almondsbury, | Main: +44 (0) 1454 465600 | | Bristol, BS32 4QX, U.K. | Fax: +44 (0) 1454 465601 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------ |