From: kaz K. <kk...@rr...> - 2003-06-20 03:55:35
|
Daniel Jacobowitz <dr...@fa...> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 10:43:33AM +0900, kaz Kojima wrote: [snip] >> I agree with this one. About pread64/pwrite64, did you see the argument >> in the another list >> <URL:http://www.geocrawler.com/mail/msg.php3?msg_id=10038494&list=3076>? > > Sorry, too many lists - I'm not on linuxsh-dev. I admit I only tested > SH-3, though. So I guess that patch would break SH-4? I think so. The problem is that SH-3 and SH-4 use the different calling conventions for long long argument when the only half 32-bit of it can be passed via R7. SH-3 ABI does and SH-4 ABI not :-( > Has Toshinobu-san's patch been applied (where)? I've just seen http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/linuxsh/linux/ and found that it was applied to HEAD (2.5.71) and the linux-2_4-branch (currently 2.4.21) at least. Sorry for the inconvenience. It would be better to apply it against 2.4.13, for example, because it is still used widely. Regards, kaz |