Re: [linuxsh-dev] [RFC] Add map_pci_irq to machvec.h?

[Paul M. <le...@li...>]

On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 01:58:17PM +0100, Alex Bennee wrote:
> Is it worth actually pushing on with this and adding it to the tree? The
> current hack in arch/sh/kernel/pci_st40.c has been there for a while and
> the machvec approach makes things a lot cleaner?
>=20
The map_whatever_irq() stuff is already board specific, it's just the ST40
specific implementation that made this ugly by way of ifdef abuse. Since
there's already a CONFIG_PCI directive in the overdrive-specific code, we
can just move this definition out of the pci-st40 code and move it into the
board specific code.

Since the machvec is going away, we don't want to be adding to it unless
it's absolutely necessary.

Under 2.5 boards are broken out quite a bit better, and the old stboards/
stuff goes away entirely, so this is much easier to deal with here.