From: David W. <dw...@in...> - 2003-06-12 10:04:06
|
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 02:58, kaz Kojima wrote: > You can find the arguments starting from > <URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-10/msg00700.html>. > It's for powerpc, but explains why no-implicit-fp option doesn't > exist in FSF code. Ah, It reminds me why I tried to forget about > this option :-) Mark Mitchell said "I agree, on all points... Clearly, many people have a real need for this functionality." I think the fact that it's happening now for both PPC and SH is indicative that it shouldn't be a machine-specific option. The only reason that GCC doesn't use FP on other platforms is because it hasn't yet found a case in which it's faster to do so. I can imagine it starting to use SSE and similar stuff on i386, in future, etc. GCC should probably have a '-mno-implicit-fp' option in _generic_ code, and it can have no effect on those back ends which haven't yet learned how to make use of the floating point unit without explicitly being asked to. -- dwmw2 |