From: kaz K. <kk...@rr...> - 2003-06-12 01:49:49
|
Dan Kegel <dk...@ix...> wrote: > As for gcc-3.4 ... since earlier compilers had -mno-implicit-fp, > couldn't you consider this a bugfix rather than a feature? :-) Maybe all sh-linux folks will think so :-) But it exists only locally patched gcc including the recent Debian gcc-3.2.x sources and Sugioka-san's toolchain. You can find the arguments starting from <URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-10/msg00700.html>. It's for powerpc, but explains why no-implicit-fp option doesn't exist in FSF code. Ah, It reminds me why I tried to forget about this option :-) Regards, kaz |