From: kaz K. <kk...@rr...> - 2003-05-07 02:49:44
|
Daniel Jacobowitz <dr...@fa...> wrote: > I want to add that moving it to libc wouldn't hurt that case: they'd > get a unique copy when loaded. Agreed again. There is no runtime problem if it moved to libc.so or anywhere "always exists". -z defs issue only. >>> I'd have to think about it... I think it makes more sense in libc. >> >> I have no strong sense about where it is placed if it's unique. >> Once Niibe-san proposed libfpscr.so-like which is an "always linked" >> shared library as an another possibility. > > Do you mind if I ask libc-alpha for opinions? Roland, Jakub, et al. > are a lot more on top of this than I am. I can just force -z nodefs > for now, but I'm not happy with that as a solution. Of course, no problem. Regards, kaz |