[linuxsh-dev] Re: __fpscr_values

[kaz K. <kk...@rr...>]

Daniel Jacobowitz <dr...@fa...> wrote:
>> But some shared libraries can be made without libc, can't be?
>> -z defs issue remains for them.
> 
> They shouldn't be; it causes all sorts of problems with for instance
> prelinking.

I agree with you, though my point is can/cannot.
 
>> Of course, we can treat them as the exceptions, but it seems to me
>> it's not essentially different with the current crt1.o implementation.
> 
> I'd have to think about it... I think it makes more sense in libc. 

I have no strong sense about where it is placed if it's unique.
Once Niibe-san proposed libfpscr.so-like which is an "always linked"
shared library as an another possibility.

Regards,
	kaz