[linuxsh-dev] Re: __fpscr_values

[Daniel J. <dr...@fa...>]

On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 10:21:02AM +0900, kaz Kojima wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz <dr...@fa...> wrote:
> > At the risk of missing something obvious... why not put it in libc.so
> > and libc.a (not libc_nonshared.a) directly if all you want is for it to
> > be unique in the executable?  There is always exactly one copy of libc
> > loaded, and everything should be dynamically linked to it except for
> > ld.so.
> 
> But some shared libraries can be made without libc, can't be?
> -z defs issue remains for them.

They shouldn't be; it causes all sorts of problems with for instance
prelinking.

> Of course, we can treat them as the exceptions, but it seems to me
> it's not essentially different with the current crt1.o implementation.

I'd have to think about it... I think it makes more sense in libc. 

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer