Re: [linuxsh-dev] Improved TLB miss handler (second attempt)

[Stuart M. <stu...@st...>]

Leaving it unset for now should be fine. Its only needed if you have a
system with PCMCIA implemented using the HD64465 support chip, because of
the gross way the PCMCIA attributes are handled. 

If we think this is important, then a then a better solution would be
to shift the entire pte up up or down a few bits, allowing the PTEA bits
to be stored contiguously.

Stuart


On Mon, 18 Nov 2002 13:42:54 -0500 pau...@ti... wrote:

> Stuart,
> 
> On Mon, 2002-11-18 at 06:51, Stuart Menefy wrote:
> > This should build for both SH3 and SH4, although it has only been tested
> > on SH4.
> > 
> This will only build for the ST40 stuff at the moment, due to PCC_MASK
> being set on non-ST40 and then #error'ed on further down.
> 
> Since its something that needs testing, lets just leave it unset for now
> and then turn it back on later once things work and the #error gets
> yanked.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> -- 
> Paul Mundt
> pau...@ti...
> TimeSys Corporation
>