Re: [linuxsh-dev] Improved TLB miss handler (second attempt)

[Paul M. <pau...@ti...>]

Stuart,

Looks good. Do you have any performance numbers showing how this
compares to the old handler?

This looks like a good candidate to merge into the restructure branch as
well. Can you roll a patch against that? (There's also some ST40 stuff
in cache-sh4.c that wants your attention).

On Mon, 2002-11-18 at 06:51, Stuart Menefy wrote:
> Attached is my second attempt at an improved TLB miss handler.
>=20
> Unfortuntaly the previous patch was corrupted, so I've double checked thi=
s
> one, and it applies cleanly to 2.4 brach HEAD (2.4.20-pre10) and almost
> cleanly to 2.4.18.
>=20
> This should build for both SH3 and SH4, although it has only been tested
> on SH4.
>=20

Regards,

--=20
Paul Mundt
pau...@ti...
TimeSys Corporation