Re: [linuxsh-dev] SH-5 integration issues

[David W. <dw...@in...>]

js...@mv... said:
>  And if there's already a sparc and sparc64, and mips and mips64, why
> not an shnew and shnew64?  (Is it because the other have major system
> architecture changes between 32-bit and 64-bit implementations, while
> the SH5 has already incorporated all such major changes?)

Due to lots of duplicated code, there's work under way to merge mips and 
mips64. 

--
dwmw2