Re[2]: [linuxsh-dev] Timer questions

[Masahiro A. <m-...@aa...>]

Sorry for late reply,

On Tue, 15 Jan 2002 17:21:45 -0800
Jeremy Siegel <js...@mv...> wrote:

> Thanks for the note -- maybe I'd better use TMU2 instead?

Or I can move RTLinux's to TMU2, if general feature which uses TMU1 is
added to standard kernel.

> Actually though, what mode do you run it in?  If you're doing timestamps,
> you're probably using it in a similar way (just free-running: no interrupts,
> let it wrap 0->ffffffff) then we should be able to work it out so there's no
> conflict.

I believe I'm doing what you have described here inside RTLinux-sh. It's
free-running timer. I wanted to get finer-grained timestamp to make the
scheduler behave more precisely. 

As a matter of fact, I haven't spent much time on RTLinux-sh after I've
put it on the server, and my memory is fading :-< 

> --Jeremy Siegel

=================================
Masahiro ABE, A&D Co., Ltd. Japan