[linuxsh-dev] Re: Next change

[kaz K. <kk...@rr...>]

NIIBE Yutaka <gn...@m1...> wrote:
> I'll re-evaluate each part of patches if those are really required or
> not.

I don't know about 3.0.1-relase well but there are some patches for
3.0 which aren't needed for 3.0-branch. The aims of patches for

  gcc/config/sh/libgcc-std.ver
  gcc/config/sh/sh.h
  gcc/config/sh/sh.c (except for Niibe-san's pathes)
  gcc/except.c (except for patches to sjlj_mark_call_sites)

are done by another fixes. The patch for gcc/sibcall.c are needed
only for c++ and java exception handling. (GCC people said that
these would be unnecessary. I'm waiting.)
I don't know that the patch for gcc/flow.c(insn_dead_p) is needed
or not for 3.0-branch. This was required to build XFree86 but is
a kind of "work for me" patch and not the Right Thing.
The patch for gcc/config/sh/lib1funcs.asm (minus hidden) was already
sent to gcc-patches mailing list by gcc guy of RedHat though not yet
commited. So, I think the remained patchs are:

  All configury patches
  Niibe-san's patches to fix branch slot fill
  patch to make libgcc asm functions hidden

at least, for 3.0-branch.

	kaz