Re: [linuxsh-dev] Binutils 2.11.2 & SH

[M. R. B. <mr...@0x...>]

* M. R. Brown <mr...@0x...> on Tue, Sep 11, 2001:

> 
> Also, what makes hardhat linux so different from sh-linux that it needs
> it's own configure triplet?  Unless sh*-hardhat-linux modifies binutils in a
> way that makes it incompatible with sh*-linux, you're just adding crud.
> The configure scripts have long since supported *local*, it'd probably be
> better to use that instead (e.g. sh4el-hardhat-linux-local).
> 

Whoops, I should've suggested that you not modify binutils to support this
triplet at all.  It already supports sh[34]-*-linux, so you'd only be
adding the config.sub stuff for sh[34]*[le] and sh[34]*[be], I suppose.

Sorry if I confused anyone :).

M. R.