Re: [linuxsh-dev] byteorder.h from elf.h

[Greg B. <gb...@po...>]

NIIBE Yutaka wrote:
> 
> Removing the inclusion of asm/segment.h is the way to go.  It seems
> that no one (except me) tries to do that. 

  Probably because it's easier to create an empty header than fix
all the cruft throughout the kernel.

> It's easy to just put empty
> segment.h, but then, I will lose the pressure of removing.

  Sure, but does the SuperH team have to be the one to feel this
pressure?  It's not a SuperH-specific issue.

> Except soundcard.c (which I don't know who is in charge of), I've sent
> the fix to relevant maintainers, and positive ACK for cdrom.c,
> i82365.c, tcic.c and base.c.  I don't get reply for joydev.c yet.

  Excellent!  You may also want to check Ben Reed's Aironet 4800 driver.

  But can we wait with removing segment.h until those changes percolate
back through the mainline kernel?

Greg.
-- 
If it's a choice between being a paranoid, hyper-suspicious global
village idiot, or a gullible, mega-trusting sheep, I don't look
good in mint sauce.                      - jd, slashdot, 11Feb2000.