Re: [linuxsh-dev] Re: FPU in kernel (SH-4)

[Greg B. <gb...@po...>]

NIIBE Yutaka wrote:
> 
> Masahiro Abe wrote:
>  > [...] We've
>  > had a discussion in Japanese ML that "-m4-nofpu" and "-m4" are not
>  > compatible in terms of passing arguments to functions. "-m4-nofpu" does
>  > that in SH3 way,

  Aaaaargh!

> In short, The flag "-m4-nofpu" is not for SH-4, it's SH-3 variant
> (Though I think that the name is misnomer).

  Certainly sounds like it.  So when do get a -fnofpu option?


Greg.
-- 
If it's a choice between being a paranoid, hyper-suspicious global
village idiot, or a gullible, mega-trusting sheep, I don't look
good in mint sauce.                      - jd, slashdot, 11Feb2000.