Re: [linuxsh-dev] Re: FPU in kernel (SH-4)

[M. R. B. <mr...@0x...>]

* Greg Banks <gb...@po...> on Wed, Aug 08, 2001:

> 
>   Huh?  I seem to remember we had a problem where the gcc maintainers
> were making this (incorrect) assumption.  So, using -m4-nofpu resulted
> in __sh3__ being defined instead of __sh4__.  But I thought that had
> been cleared up by now.
> 

There was a thread on this awhile back.  m4-nofpu is an alias for the sh3,
as the sh3 code in gcc can't generate fpu code.  So the name 'm4-nofpu'
itself is a misnomer.  As always, blame the gcc people ;-).

M. R.