From: Masahiro A. <m-...@aa...> - 2001-08-07 14:20:18
|
I may not be clearly understanding your point but I would like to note... On Sun, 5 Aug 2001 17:26:12 +0900 (JST) NIIBE Yutaka <gn...@m1...> wrote: > Honestly speaking, I couldn't find a good way to extend current > implementation to general kernel FPU support (more than one kernel > task uses FPU). If we really need this, I think that it is good > design general one rather than extending current one. > > Comments? Opinions? Does anyone have driver which uses FPU? RTLinux for SH4 uses FPU. Or more precisely, real-time task running under rtlinux can use fpu. There can be more than one task running simultaneously. I'm taking Summer break now and my brain stopped working ^^;), but I would like to say that: 1) it would be good if linux-sh kernel can handle fpu issues correctly, even if it is compiled with -m4 (without -m4-nofpu option). 2) if it is not possible, rtlinux patch should take care of that. 3) or, I (or somebody) should contribute to what Niibe-san is concerned about now. Here is my opinion. I'll revisit this issue when I get back to work. -- Masahiro ABE, A&D Co., Ltd. |