[linuxsh-dev] Re: Another patch

[NIIBE Y. <gn...@m1...>]

Masahiro Abe wrote:
 > Is this patch still needed, even if current (2.4.7-pre7) code has the
 > (related, I think) patch in kernel/sched.c? I thought the change in
 > sched.c at line 610 to 614 addresses the similar problem.

Errr... perhaps, the simptom Stuart described is related.

 > I haven't tried Stuart's patch on current kernel yet. If someone can
 > shed light on this, I appreciate.

As long as I've read, his patch is correct.  Change of
arch/sh/kernel/process.c is not necessarily, though.  Because we have
the value on top of the stack (and it's not bogus this time).  I think
that pop down the value and use it for the argument of schedule_tail
is good.
--