From: NIIBE Y. <gn...@m1...> - 2001-07-12 08:17:35
|
Masahiro Abe wrote: > What is the proper way to solve this problem? Has anybody seen this? > What did you do then? Or, my assumption is not correct? > I appreciate any input. The semantics has been changed. I simply forgot to update irq_{imask,intc2,ipr}.c. We need not to enable (unmask) the IRQ if it's disabled. Your irq_maskreg.c needs similar change. Please look at the change I've done (just committed). Thanks a lot for your report. -- |