Re: [linuxsh-dev] PCI for the SH7751 Solution Engine

[Ian da S. <ida...@mv...>]

Niibe,

We agree that the 7751 support needs to be separated from the other
SolutionEngine boards.  It has been on the back of our minds, but we just
haven't gotten around to doing it.  If you are short of time, we can make
the changes; the files at issue are io_se.c, mach_se.c and setup_se.c.
Do you think we are missing anything?

If you've already done it, we'll pick up your changes.  :)

By the way, we would like to include sh-ipl+g and sh-ethboot in our
distribution.  Is that okay with you?

Ian and Jeremy.

NIIBE Yutaka wrote:

> NIIBE Yutaka wrote:
>  > Looking the specification of SolutionEngine 7751, I'd prefer having
>  > separate machine vector or I/O routines for that.  It looks for me
>  > that there's almost no common parts between SolutionEngine
>  > 7709A/7750/7750S and 7751.  Well, the name is common, I know... ;-)
>
> I'll separate out SolutionEngine 7751 support from 7709A/7750/7750S.
> As the target SolutionEngine 7751 is different beast, there's no merit
> to put the support of that target to io-se.c and others.
>
> Ian, if you have any opinion or patches, please let me know.
> --
>
> _______________________________________________
> linuxsh-dev mailing list
> lin...@li...
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxsh-dev