From: NIIBE Y. <gn...@m1...> - 2001-03-04 04:01:08
|
Philipp Rumpf wrote: > I think there's an obvious bug in the current kernel_thread code: Thanks. You're right. It seems that I've misunderstood that the immediate value were sign-extended for "tst", which is not correct. We didn't see the bug, because PID is young enough to be under 0xff. And removing the "NOTE" is also good. It's no longer valid statement with real clone implementation, I think. Will commit soon. -- |