AW: AW: [linuxsh-dev] printf

[Studencki (e. P. <Paw...@er...>]

> >Assuming he was using 38400 with a 25 MHz clock (my 
> assumptions, since
> >he mentioned t=19 fixed the problems) my correction 
> generates the proper
> >result, whereas the define in sourceforge CVS's sh-sci.h does not (it
> >generates 20) It's slight, and RS-232C is pretty tolerant (+-2% is
> >guaranteed safe, but usually up to 5-10% still works), but I believe
> >sh-sci.h is incorrect.
> >
> 
> in my environment, both generates correct value 19 in this case.

Hi,

it's my fault :) I'm using kernel 2.3.99-test7 (you are talking about newest
snapshot from CVS...)
"PCLK" in file drivers/char/sh-sci.h is differently defined as in kernel
2.4.0-test5:
#define  PCLK(current_cpu_data.module_clock)

So the problem is not with the formula but with value for PCLK.

My kernel 2.4.0 doesn't work, so I can't say, it's corect for my platform
(SH3) or not. I hope it will be working.

regards
Pawel