[linuxsh-dev] Re: Solution Engin's ATA PC-card enabler

[Toshiharu N. <no...@kt...>]

kaz Kojima wrote:
> I can't say it's wrong. But I've troubled with this bus sizing
> in porting pcmcia-cs, though I forgot its detail. This is the
> reason why I used the word defensive.

I had the same troubles, too. I memorize it that the cause was
endian conversion of MRSHPC. meaning of SWAP flag on manual was
contrary. My enabler is used with some software, then seems to
work well all. but, Because it become the cause of confusion,
I intend to revise it.

Thnaks kaz