From: Greg B. <gn...@al...> - 2000-05-23 04:54:30
|
Mitch Davis wrote: > > > I also did some work towards building gcc-core but > > I struck a few problems which slowed me down. Does > > anyone happen to know what the -F option to gperf > > is supposed to do? > > This is due to a problem with the way the files were > checked into CVS. The generated file got checked in before > the source file, so gmake thinks it needs to be regenerated. Can't say I'm surprised. I figured the perfect hash table of keywords would be a fairly static entity and not subject to change with the SH port. > > You can either do as Niibe-san has suggested regarding gperf, > or you can use "touch" as described in my earlier mail: > > http://www.geocrawler.com/lists/3/SourceForge/3076/0/3724263/ > > Any suggestions on how to fix this? You could make a trivial change to the produced file to make it's CVS modification time newer. Or add a checkout script to do the touch. But I might as well use the gperf patch; I had to build my own gperf for sourceforge anyway. Greg. -- Fight spam http://www.caube.org.au/ If it's a choice between being a paranoid, hyper-suspicious global village idiot, or a gullible, mega-trusting sheep, I don't look good in mint sauce. - jd, slashdot, 11Feb2000. |