From: Mitch D. <mj...@au...> - 2000-05-10 01:05:57
|
NIIBE Yutaka wrote: > > I'm not sure what's 7707 is. The 7707 is slightly slower than the 7709, but what it has is an extraordinary array of on-chip peripherals. If you were going to build a one-chip system, this would be the one you'd pick. > Would it be better to have config option for 7707/7709/7709A? I am currently holding onto some work which puts the 7707 in a CONFIG class of its own. > Is there any footprint (or fingerprint, whatever we say) to > distingush 7707 on runtime? Not sure. But there's no point compiling support for non-7707 on-chip peripherals if it's not a 7707. Regards, Mitch. -- | mailto:mj...@au... | Not the official view of: | | mailto:mj...@al... | Australian Calculator Opn | | Certified Linux Evangelist! | Hewlett Packard Australia | |