Re: insw broken for SH4?

[Adrian M. <ad...@ne...>]

On Sun, 2007-11-11 at 00:21 +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:

> 
> The bogus address you're hitting is a result of the address wrapping
> around. So I suggest you change your DATA_REG to 0x05f7080 and see how
> that goes.



I'm just going to write my own functions for this based on the SH64 ones
- or at least the ones that were in SH64