Re: sh: intc - mark data structures as __initdata

[Paul M. <le...@li...>]

On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 08:59:04PM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote:
> @@ -57,8 +57,8 @@ static struct intc_mask_reg mask_registe
>  	    0, UH, 0, 0, TWOD, ZD, PV, CI } },
>  };
>  
> -static DECLARE_INTC_DESC(intc_desc, "voyagergx", vectors,
> -			 NULL, NULL, mask_registers, NULL, NULL);
> +static __initdata DECLARE_INTC_DESC(intc_desc, "voyagergx", vectors,
> +				    NULL, NULL, mask_registers, NULL, NULL);
>  
>  static unsigned int voyagergx_stat2irq[32] = {
>  	IRQ_SM501_CI, IRQ_SM501_PV, IRQ_SM501_ZD, IRQ_SM501_2D,

I wonder if it makes more sense to include __initdata in the
DECLARE_INTC_DESC() itself? Is there ever going to be a situation where
it's not going to be initdata now that you're copying them out anyways?