Re: Syscall restarted with the clobbered 5th argument

[Paul M. <le...@li...>]

On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 12:00:39PM +0100, Carl Shaw wrote:
> I found another minor problem as well - we are missing a test for
> -ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK in handle_signal().
> 
> This fixes the LTP test nanosleep03 - the current kernel causes
> -ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK to reach user space rather than the correct
> -EINTR.

Hmm, wonder how we missed that. Looks like sh64 needs it too. I'll queue
up a fix for 2.6.22, thanks Carl.