Re: delayed switching

[Hideo S. <sa...@de...>]

Hi Paul,

On Thu, 10 May 2007 14:15:26 +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
> No, consider the use case where a platform implements pm_idle() and
> depends on certain conditions to be met to determine what sort of
> power-save state can be entered. It's still necessary to have the logic
> in default_idle() and to have that exported so it can be called back in
> to from pm_idle(), should the latter not have any meaningful work it can
> do at the time.

I see, but I think following change in default_idle() does not need.

+       } else
+               while (!need_resched())
+                       cpu_relax();

how about following change?

+       } else
                cpu_relax();

> In any event, if the previous patches fixes the problems you've been
> seeing, I'll queue it up. It works fine with dynamic ticks on SH7785 at
> least (both with and without hlt)..

Yes, my testing is also done successfully.