Re: create sh-boot's git repository

[Nobuhiro I. <he...@t-...>]

Hi , Paul.

Thank you for your comment.

On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 14:53:34 +0900
Paul Mundt <le...@li...> wrote:

> DOYU-san also had quite a lot of new things merged in his arch tree, have
> you consolidated with his work in this area also? (I have mirrors of this
> if you need a copy of the source). 
Yes , I know arch Repogetori of DOYU-san exists.
But his WEB server and arch server seem to have downed.
If yours offers his mirror, I  work to merge the changes .
Could you send it?

> There's still some consolidation that
> needs to happen between those and the newer Renesas versions. In the
> latter case, we have many ports hanging around that might be of general
> interest (ie, Izanagi), even if there's no real push for the part itself.

Does Renesas 's sh-boot that you write indicate the thing of www.superh-linux.
org?
If it is correct , I am importing those change to git repsitory.

I think that sh-boot is still at an important position. 
# For example , porting is easy and have many users.

> The other concern is u-boot. We now have the SH7785 work which is somewhat
> disjoint from the SH7343 port that was done some time ago, and then ST also
> has their ST-40 port. We've also been looking at it for SH7756. This also
> needs to be desperately consolidated before we have any _more_
> fragmentation. I assume ST will also be open to rebasing their ST-40
> stuff on top of generic SH support in u-boot.
> 
> Given that, is there really much point in dragging sh-boot along? Perhaps
> it's best left in a maintenance-only mode for the existing users, with
> the new ports leaning more towards u-boot.

Yes, I am interested about u-boot, and working now.
But I can not contribute the content of the activity to ML for a variety of reasons  . ;-)
I plan to make it merge with u-boot latest as for code of ST's u-boot , if I have time.

regards ,
 Nobuhiro

-- 
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
	E-Mail : he...@t-...
	GPG ID : 3170EBE9