Mitch Davis wrote:
>
> > I also did some work towards building gcc-core but
> > I struck a few problems which slowed me down. Does
> > anyone happen to know what the -F option to gperf
> > is supposed to do?
>
> This is due to a problem with the way the files were
> checked into CVS. The generated file got checked in before
> the source file, so gmake thinks it needs to be regenerated.
Can't say I'm surprised. I figured the perfect hash table of
keywords would be a fairly static entity and not subject to
change with the SH port.
>
> You can either do as Niibe-san has suggested regarding gperf,
> or you can use "touch" as described in my earlier mail:
>
> http://www.geocrawler.com/lists/3/SourceForge/3076/0/3724263/
>
> Any suggestions on how to fix this?
You could make a trivial change to the produced file to make it's
CVS modification time newer. Or add a checkout script to do the touch.
But I might as well use the gperf patch; I had to build my own
gperf for sourceforge anyway.
Greg.
--
Fight spam http://www.caube.org.au/
If it's a choice between being a paranoid, hyper-suspicious global
village
idiot, or a gullible, mega-trusting sheep, I don't look good in mint
sauce.
- jd, slashdot, 11Feb2000.
|
