Re: [Linuxsampler-devel] release trigger bug

[Christian S. <sch...@so...>]

Es geschah am Donnerstag 30 Dezember 2004 19:10 als Garett Shulman schrieb:
> Hey Mark, I don't think that the time between noteon and noteoff events
> makes a difference. In fact, the noteon event should be irrelevent
> (these seem to be playing pretty well). The noteoff event triggers a
> completely different sample than an equivelent noteon event on all of

Correct

> the patches I have. Do you happen to have Scarbee RSP 73? This gig uses
> noteoff triggered samples to simulate the sound of the damper striking
> the tine as the tine is silenced when the key is released. This should
> be quantifiable by comparing the amplitude of recordings you make from
> ls and gs in an audio editor (like snd or soundforge). I don't think
> you need to bother generating noteon events at all. Is this making
> sense? -Garett

Actually this is a good question. In regards of LS you are right, when the 
note-off arrives we play a completely independent sample and determine the 
right sample to play (together with its articulation information) by its key 
number, the positive release trigger dimension (release trigger dimension is 
a binary value, false = sample for note on, true = sample for note off) and 
its release trigger velocity (actually it depends on couple more things, but 
these can be ignored for our problem). But I'm not sure if this is correct. 
Maybe the original GSt uses the original note on velocity instead of the note 
off velocity? At least that would explain why LS and GSt behave differently 
regarding release triggered samples.

Mark, could you please determine this? I mean if the release triggered sample 
on Gst is selected by its releease velocity or by its previous note on 
velocity?

CU
Christian