Re: [Linuxsampler-devel] [PATCH] libgig version 0.7.2

[Rui N. C. <rn...@rn...>]

Hi Christian,

>> This all comes to the attached patch, which also applies for correcting
>> some other minor documentation install problems (man pages and doxygen
>> docs).
>
> I wanted to fix the doxygen issue a while ago, thanks! But what's the
> reason for this man change?
>
> diff -duPNr libgig-0.7.1-0/man/Makefile.am libgig-0.7.2-0/man/Makefile.am
> --- libgig-0.7.1-0/man/Makefile.am 2004-07-07 13:03:54.000000000 +0100
> +++ libgig-0.7.2-0/man/Makefile.am 2004-11-24 12:57:40.431283288 +0000
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
>  ## Process this file with automake to produce Makefile.in
>
>  # all man files that should be installed
> -man1_MANS = dlsdump.1 gigdump.1 gigextract.1 rifftree.1
> +man_MANS = dlsdump.1 gigdump.1 gigextract.1 rifftree.1
>

On all of the autotools installations I have around (Mdk 10.1, SUSE 9.2
and FC1) the man pages weren't being installed at all.

As it seemed, if man_MANS is not set, automake just don't generate any
actual make install rules. Go figure, it's the same autocrapola as usual
;)


>> If nothing or no one goes against this, I'll be ready to commit into CVS
>> soon.
>>
>> Oh, this patch also applies for bumping up the libgig package version to
>> 0.7.2. Please check it out carefully, and tell me if you agree.
>
> How urgent is this? My plan was to package the next release of libgig
> parallel to the release of LS and bumb the version to 1.0.0 to continue
> with libtool versioning scheme from that on. So can this wait for one or
> two weeks? If yes please just commit the changes and leave the version
> unchanged so far. I also have to change some tiny things in Debian
> packaging.
>

Not higly urgent, but by bumping up the version number I can get better
track of my own RPM packaging. Notice that the oneliner gig.h change is an
issue as for building qsampler from source, so youl better be sure you
have libgig-devel-0.7.2 installed and not libgig-devel-0.7.1.

I shall not touch the libtool versioning (0:0:0), so I think my proposed
version bump is just an interim and janitoral tagging measure.

I can see no harm in it, but you're the boss :)
-- 
rncbc aka Rui Nuno Capela
rn...@rn...