Re: [Linuxsampler-devel] Build failure: probable gcc-3.4.1 issue?

[Christian S. <sch...@so...>]

Es geschah am Mittwoch 6. Oktober 2004 15:27 als Rui Nuno Capela schrieb:
> > Is 3.4 only more strictly or are there also some known incompatibilities
> > backwards? I just wonder if we should go with 3.4 now or wait until the
> > 1st release.
>
> OK. I think there's no need for such dramatic measures ;)
>
> The attached patch solves all reported compilation problems, at least on
> my gcc-3.4.1 platform (Mdk 10.1c). It builds and runs as usual now.
>
> The major incompabilities came from Bennos's RTELMemoryPool.h, which I had
> to spend some time to change and comply, with minimal impact. IMO the

Mmm... sorry to say, but in my current dev version RTELMemoryPool.h is already
dropped. I replaced it by complete new Pool classes. So...

> Please, I'll beg you all review the changes and check if there's any issue
> lurking around. If nothing gets wrong in between I may commit to CVS ASAP.

I don't have gcc 3.4 but I'm surprised about some things, e.g. why gcc 3.4
insists on some of these "this->" pointers and e.g. the #include <errno.h>
in rtelmemory.h.

But the patch is ok, of course. I'm not yet sure when I'll commit my stuff,
cause I'm still fighting with some problems, so please go ahead and commit it.

CU
Christian