Re: [Linuxsampler-devel] liblscp packaging

[Rui N. C. <rn...@rn...>]

Hi Christian,
>
> I added files to create Debian packages for liblscp. The two packages
> ('liblscp' and 'liblscp-dev') can be generated as usual by calling
>
> 	'make -f Makefile.cvs && dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot'
>
> in the sources top level directory.
>

Cool. Even though I don't have a clue about debian packaging. Eheh...  but
"fakeroot" sounds funny :)


> I propose to change the pkg-config library name (in liblscp.pc.in) from
> 'liblscp' to 'lscp', as it's common to omit the 'lib' prefix and maybe
> also to rename that file to lscp.pc.in.
>

That's OK with me, but /only/ on the pkg-config matter. I do like the
liblscp name, and no, I don't have any objective argument to hold that,
it's just folklore :)

I guess the same applies to libgig, where the pkg-config file
(libgig.pc.in) should be renamed to gig.pc.in ?

Cheers,
-- 
rncbc aka Rui Nuno Capela
rn...@rn...