|
From: Christian S. <chr...@ep...> - 2004-07-02 22:44:20
|
Es geschah am Freitag, 2. Juli 2004 23:36 als Rui Nuno Capela schrieb: > >> Is it also OK to remove from CVS all those auto-generated files? I mean > >> the ones generated after a 'make -f Makefile.cvs' ? I don't see the > >> point having it on the repository, do you? > > > > Yes I do. The advantage is you can compile the library even without > > having to install the auto tools. That's why they are there. > > > > It's like the same with the parser in LS. You can regenerate it if you > > have lex & yacc installed by doing 'make parser', or just stick with our > > pregenerated parser source files. > > Oops, about too late. Already committed. Damn, it was just minutes ago. > > To save the day, I can always do the autocrap-bootstrap myself and check > in the regenerated files, if it pleases you. Must I? Np, forget it. I forgot the libtool aspect. You need to have libtool installed to create the lib and libtool has a dependency to parts of autotools. so ... > OTOH, I've already packaged all my stuff, which is available on the usual > place (http://www.rncbc.org/ls). You might build your (official) tarball > now :) Yeah, maybe tomorrow. Btw, you could also commit the Borland/Win stuff. Maybe you create a win32 directory or something for the fake headers. Once gigextract's dependency to libaudiofile is replaced by libsndfile, then even gigextract will be conveniently compilable on Windows. CU Christian |