Re: [Linuxsampler-devel] Re: Packaging libgig 0.7.1

[Rui N. C. <rn...@rn...>]

Christian,
>>
>> BTW, do you know the difference between pkglib_ and lib_ prefixes? The
>> later seems to be more standard :)
>
> I wasn't sure either, but AFAIK the only difference is the target
> directory.
>>From the libtool doc ("9.3.2 Building Libtool Libraries"):
>
>>  Automake predefines the variable `pkglibdir', so you can use
>>  pkglib_LTLIBRARIES to install libraries in $(libdir)/@PACKAGE@/.
>
> That was the only difference I found.
>

That's it. I remember now that I disliked to install the libraries under
"${prefix}/lib/libgig" (as the pkglib_ prefix seems to imply) and
preferred the "${prefix}/lib" instead. One less line under
"/etd/ld.so.conf" is one less line under my worries.

Feeling even better now.

> So, it's ok, go ahead and commit it.
>

I'll do it after changing the License and URL on the specfile as you asked.

Is it also OK to remove from CVS all those auto-generated files? I mean
the ones generated after a 'make -f Makefile.cvs' ? I don't see the point
having it on the repository, do you?
-- 
rncbc aka Rui Nuno Capela
rn...@rn...